Luke 2:8-19: And there were shepherds living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch
over their flocks at night. 9 An angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the
glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. 10 But the angel
said to them, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news that will cause great
joy for all the people. 11 Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to
you; he is the Messiah, the Lord. 12 This will be a sign to you: You will find
a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.” 13 Suddenly a great company of
the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying,
15 When the angels had left them and gone into heaven, the shepherds said to one another, “Let’s go to Bethlehem and see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has told us about.” 16 So they hurried off and found Mary and Joseph, and the baby, who was lying in the manger. 17 When they had seen him, they spread the word concerning what had been told them about this child, 18 and all who heard it were amazed at what the shepherds said to them.
14 “Glory to God in the highest
heaven,
and on earth peace to those
on whom his favor rests.”15 When the angels had left them and gone into heaven, the shepherds said to one another, “Let’s go to Bethlehem and see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has told us about.” 16 So they hurried off and found Mary and Joseph, and the baby, who was lying in the manger. 17 When they had seen him, they spread the word concerning what had been told them about this child, 18 and all who heard it were amazed at what the shepherds said to them.
There were some psychological studies published in
1996 by Dov Cohen, Richard Nisbett, Brian Bowdle and Norbert Schwarz in the
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Titled Insult, aggression, and
the southern culture of honor: An 'experimental ethnography'. The study attempted to see how Southerners
and Northerners in America responded to insult. The authors argued that a
"culture of honor" had been, historically, more robust in the
Southern United States (due to immigration patterns) making Southerners more
sensitive to perceived affronts to their personal honor (e.g., being insulted
or disrespected).
To test this theory the researchers asked Northern and
Southern college students to come to a building where they were asked to fill
out some surveys. After filling out the surveys the subjects were asked to drop
them off at the end of a hallway and then return to the room. But the hall was
blocked by a filing cabinet, open, and with a person looking through it. To get
past this person the subject had to ask this person to close the drawer to make
room to pass. (The person at the filing cabinet was in on the study.) As the
subject passed the person at the filing cabinet reopened the drawer. As the
subject approaches for a second time this is a description of what happened:
As the participant returned seconds later and walked
back down the hall toward the experimental room, the confederate (who had
reopened the file drawer) slammed it shut on seeing the participant approach
and bumped into the participant with his shoulder, calling the participant an
“asshole.” Sitting in the hallway nearby were raters who looked, ostensibly,
like students reading or studying. But what the raters actually did was to look
at the face of the subject at the moment the insult occurred. They then rated
how angry versus amused the subject looked. Some would smile or laugh it
off. Some would get angry and seek to aggressively confront the person.
The research question was simple: How did the Southerners and
Northerners compare when responding to the insult? Was one group more angered
or amused? The findings, consistent with the Southern culture of honor
hypothesis, showed that Southerners were more likely to become angered by the
insult while Northerners were more likely to become amused. This finding was
reconfirmed in a variety of different follow up studies (for example,
Southerners had significantly more stress hormones in their body relative to
the Northerners after the insult).
All in all, then, it seemed that Southerners were working with, and
defending, a more robust "honor code" than Northerners. But where
does a "culture of honor" come from?
One explanation is that different ethics of honor and retaliation have
evolved in herding versus farming cultures. The argument goes like this. It's
hard to steal from farmers. If I have acres and acres of wheat or corn it's
pretty hard for a couple of thieves to make off overnight with the fruits of my
labor. Also for large parts of year there really is nothing to steal. There is
no crop during the winter, spring and early summer. In short, for most of the
year there is nothing the farmer has to guard or protect. And even when there
is a crop to steal you can't make off with it overnight. Harvesting is time
consuming and labor intensive.
All in all, then, farming cultures, it is argued, have evolved a fairly
pacific and non-retaliatory social ethic.
Herding cultures face a very different problem. Imagine a cattle
rancher. You can steal cattle much more quickly and efficiently relative to
trying to steal a corn harvest. A handful of cattle rustlers can quickly make
off with hundreds of cattle, with devastating economic impact upon the rancher.
More, the cattle are always around. Unlike the farmer, the rancher's livelihood
is exposed 24/7 for 365 days a year. While the farmer sleeps peacefully during
the winter months there is no respite for the rancher.
Given these challenges, it is argued that herding cultures have
developed a very strong ethic of retaliation. The only way to survive,
economically, in a herding culture is to protect your livelihood and honor with
lethal vigilance. Farmers, by contrast, are spared all this. And, given these
contrasting demands, there has been a lot of data to suggest that herding
cultures (or places settled by herding cultures like the American South) are,
indeed, more violent than farming cultures.
(Note to the reader: This argument is disputed and thus there are other
ongoing studies.)
At any rate even if you don’t find the argument compelling you might
recognize the stereotypes from American film. In Western films farmers are
rarely violent. They tend to be peaceable. By contrast, ranchers and cowboys
tend to be violent. And when someone in Western films has become respectable
it's often associated with settling down and taking up the farming life.
Conversely, leaving the farm is the resumption of violence. Think of William
Munny in Unforgiven.
Why am I going into all this? Well, during the Christmas season we are
exposed to many portrayals of the shepherds in Luke 2 as they keep watch over
their flocks at night. And these images often look like Hallmark cards. It's
sweet and idyllic. Peaceable.
Well, there was a reason these guys were up at night watching their
flocks. They are examples of a herding culture. The point being, these
shepherds were pretty tough, even violent, men. They aren't into sheep because
they are sweet looking props for our Nativity sets. When you see those sheep
you should see dollar signs, stock portfolios, walking retirement plans. That's
why the shepherds were up at night. If I put your paycheck, in 10 dollar bill
increments, in a pile in your front yard I bet you'd be up a night keeping a
watch on your flock. Gun in hand.
The point in all this is that these shepherds were likely rough and
violent men. They had to be. So it's a bit shocking and strange to find the
angels appearing to these men. Thugs might be standing around in our Nativity
sets. That scene around the manger might be a bit more scandalous than we had
ever imagined.
But here's the truly amazing part of the story. The angels proclaim to
these violent men a message of "peace on earth." And, upon hearing
this message, the shepherds leave their flocks and go searching for the baby!
Can you now see how shocking that behavior is? This is something you don't do
in a herding culture.
Now think about how all this might apply to us. For most of our lives
we stand around protecting what is ours. Our neighborhoods, borders, homes,
401Ks, income, jobs, status, reputation. And on and on and on. We're like those
shepherds, keeping watch over our flocks, even at night. We're tensed,
suspicious, watchful, and ready to pounce. And all this makes us violent
people, in small ways and large. That's the ethic of this world. It's a herding
ethic. Protect what is yours because someone is coming to take it from you.
It's a culture of honor. And violence.
And so the angels come to us and proclaim "peace on earth and good
will to men." But how is that going to happen? Well, the story in Luke 2
shows us the way:
We follow the example of the shepherds. We leave our flocks and our
lifestyles of violent vigilance...and go in search of the baby.
Comments
Post a Comment