The term "secularism" was
first used by the British writer George Jacob Holyoake in 1851.[1]
Holyoake was picking up on some of the thinking that emerged out of the
Enlightenment and the philosophies of thinkers like René Descartes. Enlightenment
thinking, among other aspects, seeks to create a division between “religion”
and “secular”. In enlightenment ways of thinking “religion” should remain
private because it causes too much conflict between people (The Thirty Years
War) and it has not “fixed” the world. The
enlightenment offers a new vision for how the world should operate based on
reason. Reason, according to the enlightenment, is not based on any form of
tradition – especially any “religious” tradition.
This way of thinking is engrained
into the western church and society. An outgrowth of this thinking offers
people a way to divide to a person’s world into things that are considered
“religious” and things that are considered “secular”. For example a person’s
weekly job might be considered “secular” while work or service done in the name
of the church would be considered “religious” or “spiritual”. One might listen
to “secular” music that is separate from “religious” music. In the Bible this
division is not a consideration. For example Exodus 20-23 sets forth a set of
rules and regulations on a host of subjects. Subjects that we might be tempted to lable religious or secular. Yet, what is interesting is that
the arrangement of the regulations assumes that “there is no dichotomy
between the secular and sacred, between ‘church’ and ‘state’, between justice
and religion in Israel, but that these are inextricably intertwined.”[2]
These invisible lines of religious
and secular often seem to cause a dichotomy that might not even exist. For
example we might pray for someone to find a job because that is something
religious or spiritual. Yet, for the church to offer a person job training
would be considered secular. Singing in church is something spiritual. Songs
outside of the church context that might speak of God (Mumford and Sons "Awakemy Soul") are considered secular. This makes me wonder if the church is missing
out on offering real assistance and meeting real needs. We will hand out food
to those in need – something spiritual. Yet, helping that person learn job
skills to better their income potential is something secular. Yet, what if the
church offered a way for people to learn new job skills? There are some
churches already finding ways to partner with large and small business. Eastern University offers a degree that is a combination of theology and entrepreneurship. Perhaps
what I am attempting to communicate is . . . if the church is to be a
continuation of the ministry of Jesus then maybe the imaginary lines of what is
often considered “religious” and “secular” might need to be erased. What if being so called "religious" means offering a cup of water to others in the form of a job or skill training for a job. What if churches used their often otherwise empty buldings during the week to offer some space to small business start ups? What if churches partnered with lcoal training tech centers that might help people get the training they need for a job?
Not sure how it all works yet I am up for trying out some what if's.
Not sure how it all works yet I am up for trying out some what if's.
Comments
Post a Comment